Back to Risa, who is just seething about the baby. Rightly so.
Now Risa realizes he doesn’t just make bad decisions, he makes dangerous ones.
Unlike dragging an unconscious drunk-the-koolaid tithe around, which isn’t dangerous. Even though a few chapters ago you were seriously speculating that doing this was behind the lack of reporting in the news as part of a plot to murder you both for kidnapping.
Anyway, this is more “my character’s flaw is being a klutz”. Connor is obviously getting set up as virtuous for what he did. Imagine how different it’d be if he’d actually done it because he’s impulsive and just grabs stuff without thinking.
The school bus only has a few kids on it as they step on
Bullshit, book. This was apparently the most trafficked bus stop in school history. There was a pack of kids there and it took them so long to get on that they had time for that long drama with the baby. Lev only had to hold up the bus at the very end, which we can tell because if he’d been doing that for any length of time the bus driver would’ve started yelling.
Anyway, the driver doesn’t seem to care about the baby and Risa guesses it’s because she can see another kid with one of the bus. Which means teen pregnancy must be through the roof because we were just told the bus is almost empty and yet already there’s a baby.
Lev wants to know why there’s a baby all of the sudden.
“They’re looking for two boys and a girl. Having a baby will throw them off.”
See, if that’d been Connor’s reasoning, it’d also have been an improvement – Risa could still rightly accuse him of being an idiot. But even without the help of being in his head last chapter, he’s doing a terrible job of lying lest anyone get confused and think he didn’t do it just because he’s so great.
Arg! I actually really like the idea of Connor doing this but the book needs to fuck off with its “poor Connor everyone’s mad at him and he makes terrible decisions because he’s so kind” thing.
Connor offers to hold it and Risa says nope, she’s keeping it because he’ll just make it cry.
Risa is no stranger to babies. At the state home she occasionally got to work with the infants. This one probably would have ended up at a state home too. She could tell that the woman at the door had no intention of keeping it.
THEN WHY EVEN FUCKING BOTHER WITH THE WHOLE STORKING THING? WHAT THE FUCK IS THIS?
Literally the only point in bothering to stork kids instead of directly giving them up is if the storked person can’t turn around and do exactly that.
The girl with the baby that Risa was avoiding eye contact with earlier for some reason hops back a few seats the next time the bus stops for some baby chat.
I’m Alexis, and this is Chase.” Her baby looks at Risa curiously, and drools over the seat back. Alexis picks up the baby’s limp hand, and makes it wave like she might wave the hand of a toy doll.
And here we see the book reving up for the other side of prolife fuckery.
See, if someone gets pregnant and abandons the baby, she’s childish and irresponsible. If someone gets pregnant and keeps the baby, she’s childish and irresponsible and now you can always tell that she’s someone you should look down on.
The book helpfully informs us that Alexis either literally is or is acting younger than Risa. See, it’s fine to make this one underage because it just ties into the idea she’s so stupid she doesn’t understand it’s bad to have a baby, so the book can again dodge any sympathy.
Alexis goes on to say it’s “brave” to go back to school so soon, which is probably in the sense of acknowledging that getting pregnant out of wedlock means people treat you badly – it’s possible it means in the sense that childbirth leaves you physically mangled, but that wouldn’t really fit well with “brave” and more importantly, wouldn’t allow Alexis thinking it’s praiseworthy to be another part of why she’s a terrible shameless whore.
“That’s sooooo great that you’re still seeing each other. Chaz—that’s Chase’s father—doesn’t even go to our school anymore. He got sent to military school. His parents were so mad when they found out that I was, you know, ‘uploaded,’ he was afraid they might actually have him unwound. Can you believe it?”
Risa could strangle this girl if it weren’t for the fact that it would leave drooling Chase motherless.
Because the girl is a filthy childish slut who isn’t being properly shamed! The only reason we shouldn’t murder all these whores is then we’d have to find real people to take care of the disgusting bastards they produce.
I should remind you that Risa is fifteen, and if we’re to take her literally about Alexis being younger, she’s fourteen. Look at how the fourteen year old sounds like a regular kid! Look at how she talks like she’s still an actual person and not permanently ruined! How dare she.
When prolifers complain about how our godless society is causing teen pregnancy, it’s not because they actually think that kids getting pregnant is bad for the kid. It’s because the younger they are, the more likely they’re unmarried whores who, in a proper society, would be packed off to the convent to spend the rest of their life scrubbing the floor.
Then the evil bitch-whore asks if the baby’s a girl or boy. Risa hesitates and guesses girl. I’m sort of hoping it’ll turn out wrong, because girl babies are considered extra precious defenseless little blessings, so having it be a girl would just be further hammering in that babies are wonderful and abandoning one makes you Satan.
Connor then volunteers “Didi” as the name for the kid.
This brings forth a little grin from Risa in spite of how angry she is at him.
And my hackles are up yet again! This is another of those relationship dynamic things I don’t like – it tends to play out where the girl is mad, but then smiles/laughs/whatever (the very phrase “in spite of” often features), and then that’s it, she’s not allowed to complain about it or criticize whatever the issue was.
It’s especially inexplicable here – what’s so great about recycling the name she used?
“Yeah,” says Risa. “Same as me. Family tradition.”
Okay, so I just checked and the author’s fifty. So let me tell you a story about names. The only adult I know who’s named after a parent is my uncle, who is also fifty, and my grandfather had one of those super nicknamey names that can turn into a dozen names easily, so they were never called the same thing. And my mother and aunt both bucked tradition by being named after no one in the family at all, well before this guy was even born. My father is named after a family member, but it was an uncle in his case. My little brother is named after my grandfather’s middle name, because middle names are what you use to bounce names around now and also Mom just liked it, and it turns out the guy to actually have that name was pretty horrible but we don’t care because it was never really about tradition or honoring some guy.
There may be some area somewhere you could say you were naming a kid after you and not have it seem incredibly weird, but there can’t be many. (Plus, of all parents, younger ones are most likely to special snowflake it up with invented names!) And furthermore, Risa doesn’t have a family. She’s never even been outside the compound, and media certainly doesn’t highlight this tradition because two characters with the same name is generally considered a bad idea even before you make them related. I wouldn’t expect her to even know people did this unless she was established as being super into early colonial history or something, and even then she’d be expected to understand it doesn’t happen now, and if she forgets that they’re trying not to stand out in order to live out her colonial fantasy, she should get a death glare from Connor for being stupid.
“Well, you’re going to love Center-North High,” Alexis says. “They’ve got a great day care center, and really take care of student-mothers. Some teachers even let us nurse in class.”
Translation: evil liberal agenda progressive argleblagle kids today.
It should be pointed out that this is actually represents a significant commitment to the kids, both students and infants. Being a mother is extremely difficult and being a single mother as most of them likely are is far worse. Infants sleep only short periods, so they remove their parent’s ability to get the solid chunks of sleep adults need to function. (And remember teens often have trouble with getting enough sleep on their own.) They cry often and sometimes for no reason at all, and the cry is designed to be impossible to ignore.
Daycares do not like to deal with newborns because they are fragile and demanding. And schools do not like babies because they are screamy and demanding. To allow babies in class they probably have special areas for the girls to take the baby when it’s wailing and all sorts of policies about handling students having to leave class unpredictably. They also likely have someone with medical training on hand, both for the obvious sudden problems with one of the kids and also for any mother who needs advice.
The school also likely has an actual class or something to teach the kids the basics, like wearing a proper bra, why your baby should not lie on its face, foods that may kill your baby, babyproofing your house, signs your baby may be about to die from other causes you have no control over…
If the author even understands that this represents a great deal of effort, it’s probably followed by “and they STEAL OUR TAX DOLLARS TO PAY FOR IT!!!!!!!!!!” More likely, it’s just hatred for the idea that these kids are allowed in school instead of cowering in shame at home the way Jesus wants.
Also, on the subject of breastfeeding, it’s generally unpleasant at best, particularly for new mothers. My mother breastfed me and it meant half my diet was fresh blood. Breastfeeding a baby is going through a variable degree of trouble for the baby’s sake, ranging from inconvenience to severe pain. That the various “student mothers” are breastfeeding is probably mentioned without any thought about this, just as there’s no consideration for anything else women have to go through for a baby.
Connor puts his hand over Risa’s shoulder. “Do fathers get to watch?”
Risa shrugs off his arm, and quietly stomps on his foot. He winces, but says nothing. If he thought he was out of the doghouse, he’s dead wrong. As far as she’s concerned, his name is Fido.
Hey, remember how Risa doesn’t like to be touched? The book sure can’t give less of a fuck. She’s just mad he took the baby because Risa isn’t so awesome as Connor and doesn’t love babies enough.
Also, to answer your question, Connor/Author: it is perfectly possible, even easy, to breastfeed under your shirt. All it requires is a loose shirt, and I assume anyone breastfeeding would already be wearing that because tight shirts are going to be really unpleasant due to the general lactation thing. There are also nursing bras to make it even easier. I would bet all of the girls would quickly master this art when presented with a class of leering guys.
Then Alexis notes that her “brother”, Lev, is already making new friends :)
She tries to hear what they’re talking about but can’t hear anything beyond Alexis’s blathering.
Risa, you are the least objectionable character so far. Stop working so hard to catch up with the others.
Alexis grins and rolls her shoulders a bit. “He’s kind of cute.”
Risa didn’t think it was possible to like Alexis any less than she already did. Apparently she was wrong. Alexis must see the look in Risa’s eyes, because she says, “Well, I mean cute for a freshman.”
“He’s thirteen. He skipped a grade,” Risa says, burning Alexis an even meaner warning gaze that says, Keep your claws away from my little brother.
She’s expressing interest in a guy even after getting knocked up, the disgusting bitch!
“Sorry,” says Risa, softening her gaze. “Long night with the baby. It’s made me cranky.”
“Oh, believe me, I’ve totally been there.”
It looks as if the Alexis Inquisition might continue until they reach the school, but the bus comes to another sudden stop, making little Chase bump his chin on the seat back, and he begins to cry. Suddenly Alexis goes into mother mode, and the conversation ends.
This fucking book.
It’s just straight up about hating women. Alexis is, supposedly, doing the very thing the narration demonized the mother in the ninth chapter for not doing. But prolifers don’t actually care if the women take care of the baby, because it’s really about the crime of having sex and needing to be visibly punished for it instead of “avoiding responsibility” and getting away with it. If they could criminalize out of wedlock pregnancy itself, they’d do that and probably end up fine with aborting them – keep a few of the blond and blue eyed ones for proper parents with fertility problems and get rid of the rest.
Alexis’ sympathy doesn’t mark her as a decent person, because it’s sympathy based on experience with a baby, which she has because she is a filthy whore and therefore not a person. Alexis being a good, caring mother also doesn’t mark her as decent because again, filthy whore who isn’t a person. In fact, she’d be better if she’d given up the baby and then found a good Christian man to forgive her for being so terrible. Because it’s not about the child, it’s about control. The fact Alexis seems happy to raise the baby is why she shouldn’t have it.
But it can’t just say that outright, because that would mean admitting this is about punishing women over sex, not saving the life of a baby. She happens to be a teenage mother with a baby, and also happens to have every single thing about her treated as loathsome, but it’s not actually saying the two things are linked! It’s just a coincidence.
It baffles me why authors do this. A character is introduced whose behavior is actually quite age-appropriate, they react to situations in perfectly rational ways, and the protagonist despises them. Reminds me of Johanna in the lamentable Hunger Games books — I thought she was one of the best characters, yet Katniss is all hatey on her for most of the trilogy.
I think it’s at least in part that the protagonist has to be THE BEST EVAH. Books like HG leave no room for flawed protagonists (this is also a big cause of the protag-centered morality you see) so every other character, even one with normal qualities, must be evil so the main character/author insert/wish fulfillment looks better by comparison.
Oops, didn’t see your reply.
I think it’s particularly an issue with characters who don’t like the protagonist. If you’ve got variation, you’re going to end up with otherwise good people who just happen not to get along with the main character, and if you can’t handle people not liking the main character, they’re going to be labeled evil for no textual reason.
And also there’s the whole “there can be only one” thing you get with female characters, where you can have other male characters around a guy, but a prominent female secondary character is almost always framed as the rival.
Omigod you’re so right. I didn’t watch it, but I’ve heard people talk about Buffy being awesome because she had a smart & capable female sidekick. (Though someone mentioned recently that the sidekick turns out to be a lesbian, so no worries about the rivalry issue.)
Misogyny and protagonist-centrism in the Hunger Games, just plain misogyny here. How dare Johanna be comfortable with her own naked body and another woman (in books with female protagonists other women are often treated as competition for attention). How dare she not adore Katniss, our esteemed and perfect main character.
In a similar vein, teenaged women who have sex are always despicable vapid little sluts in Unwind (and much of the world). No narrative comment is made on the guy who was also a teenager and was also responsible, of course.
It’s not like it’s his fault. He had the opportunity to have sex, you can’t expect him to turn that down. That’s why we need to make girls stop being so slutty, they’re tempting the innocent boys!
I wonder if Neal Shusterman will be getting one of Rep. Steve Stockman’s new bumper stickers. Surely he’ll want to acknowledge such a true equal to himself in thoughtful and nuanced political commentary.
I dunno, the bumper stickers are at least kind of funny just in how far they go. If this book gave the babies guns for self defense, I’d still hate it but I’d admire the inventiveness, plus it’s hilarious because they’d just end up killing themselves too, so it’s the perfect metaphor for refusing abortions that’ll save the life of the mother.
…ha. Ha ha. Ha ha ha.
Oh man I cannot wait for you to meet the clappers.
Wow, I hadn’t heard about those stickers. Genius. In a similar vein, if Jesus had been armed, he wouldn’t have been crucified. (Or at least he might have put up a better fight.)
Everyone needs to hear about those bumper stickers. They’re just so gloriously dumb.
…you know what’s weird about that? I mean besides the blasphemy and all. If Jesus had been armed, he’d have killed a couple Romans and then been crucified. Super Jesus and his awesome sword might be able to keep hacking guys up until he’s free, but unless he’s miracling the bullets, he runs out and dies. Guns are a weapon that comes from modern industry, and it’s a weapon that really works best when you have backup and support. Dropping one gun into a time portal to two thousand years ago would freak people out a bit and then it’d be over.
The guy fed 5,000 with two loaves of bread — he should be able to mow down an equivalent amount of Romans with two magazines. He’d be a Galilean Kazuo Kiriyama. (Though Super Jesus and his awesome sword of passion is just as funny, if not funnier.)
[[There may be some area somewhere you could say you were naming a kid
after you and not have it seem incredibly weird, but there can’t be
many.]]]
This is the complete opposite of my experience. I don’t know if this is a city/country east coast/west coast thing or a cultural (ie, Italian) thing, but everyone in my family is named after everyone else. We are 95% Joseph and Anthony, and my brother is the fourth Raymond in a row. (If you’ve ever seen My Big Fat Greek Wedding… it’s like that.) I think it’s really bizarre you don’t know anyone who’s a III or IV. I know a Cornelius V, and come to think of it, they’re Irish.
Yeah that’s more like my experience too. Though not always with
numbers, frequently with different nicknames (my sister-in-law, her
mother, and her grandmother are all Elizabeth but with different
nicknames). I’ve also known some people who have a parent’s name but
they get called by their first and middle name (I’m pretty sure that’s
more of a southern thing though).
The maternal half of my family only has like ten names they pass around, but it’s all aunt->niece grandfather->grandson style stuff.
There was recently a IV added to my family, but that’s because the III married in. And everyone I actually talk to is kind of quietly side-eying that naming decision. My people are generally in favor of naming kids after grandparents and great aunts and such, but naming them after parents is weird.
My culture doesn’t believe in naming babies after anyone’s who still alive, so there tends to be a two to three generation gap for reusing names. Something about the angel of death getting confused and taking the baby instead of the old person. It wasn’t common at public school either, but then everyone’s parents had names that were really trendy and popular in the 60s and 70s and their kids had ones that were in style twenty, thirty years later. A whole lot of people in any given class had the same name, but no one in the same family.
My mother’s side of the family always named the eldest daughter Josephine, so we’ve had like, 13 or so Josephines. I’m the odd one out, because my mother broke tradition. Apparently there are still family members on the east coast mad about it. So I guess that’s why I don’t find the naming thing weird.
Alright, so I double-checked with my mom, and here’s how it traditionally works in Italian culture:
-The first son is named after the paternal grandfather
-The second son is named after the maternal grandfather
-The third son is named after the father
Don’t know how it works for girls, but my mom and aunt are named after their grandmothers, so it’s probably usually the same.
Of course, this often results in situations where the paternal grandfather and the father have the same name. A third son naming his first son after his father is also naming him after himself, so you get long unbroken chains in addition to a lot of cousins with the same name.
Fun fact: When my great-grandfather came through Ellis Island, he was asked his first name. His name was the Italian version of Vincent, which is pronounced vin-CHENS. The guy taking down names didn’t understand and wrote down his name as “James,” which he kept. The result, though, is that in my mom’s generation, boys named James and boys named Vincent are both named after their grandfather.
Hm. A rough check of relatives found that one of the kids was named after the dad, but the rest were all further out relatives (and one godfather->goddaughter, but swapping a name’s gender usually makes it pretty distinct). I’m not sure if it was just less of a thing to them originally or that things just changed fast.
(How do you keep track of the Vincents, though? That’s not one with good nicknames.)
My mom’s family is fond of nicknames. We have a little of “Little”s (Little Bess, Little Anthony) and people who go by their first and middle names (Jimmy Joe).
Though, honestly, I can’t keep track of them at all. My grandfather was one of seven, and all of them had a ton of kids. My mother has like a million cousins and after 22 years I still can’t keep up. AND THEY ALL LOOK EXACTLY THE SAME.
…Could you please at least not classify all prolifers as people who don’t actually care about the babies but want the young moms to suffer? Because that’s really hurtful, to someone who is actually pro life- not pro “the slut deserved it.”
You tend to demonize the group as a whole in a lot of your reviews. You probably have reason, which is really sad and awful- that that’s become the face and heart of some of the movement.
I’ve been ignoring the jabs at Christianity and/or prolife movements because your reviews are so thoughtful, and I feel like I can learn quite a lot about writing from reading them. But by reading, I feel like I’m getting my beliefs insulted every other time.
And you know what? That’s really not your problem. You’re not looking for someone to whine about hurt feelings.
I’m not going to threaten to quit reading, because that doesn’t affect you. And it wouldn’t be to spite you if I did. I guess I just wanted to put it out there that all these bits together hurt. You talk a lot about how the other side is vicious to yours, but… you’re a bit harsh on your opposition as well.
http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2007/04/22/pro-life-mississippi-has-highest-infant-mortality-rate-in-the-nation/
It’s not about the face of the movement, it’s about what that movement actually accomplishes.
Did every last person who wanted this cackle to themselves about how this would lead to the suffering of babies after they were born? Of course not. But enough of them felt this was an acceptable tradeoff if it meant the unborn were safe to keep supporting it.
If you don’t want to punish women for having sex, fund all those social programs that pregnant women and single mothers need if they’re to raise a kid with the money currently being spent on forcing them to have the kid no matter what.