Unwind Ch20: Risa

Risa’s the first in line when Sonia calls them to come up. Roland would have been, but Connor threw an arm out like a turnstile to let Risa get to the stairs first.

Connor continues to be a dick for no reason!

The driver stands beside the open back door of the truck. He’s a scruffy guy who looks like he’d more likely be delivering illegal drugs than kids.

Because human traffickers are such high class looking people?

“Honey, the baby can’t go where you’re going,” Hannah says.
Reflexively, Risa holds the baby closer to her. She doesn’t even know why. All she’s wanted to do since getting stuck with the thing is to get rid of it.

Here we go. See, Risa isn’t an evil irresponsible slutwhore. Good women want all babies.

Hannah says she’ll take it and say they were storked.

Connor, however, steps between them. “Do you want this baby?”
“She’s willing to take it,” says Risa. “That’s enough.”
“But does she want it?”
“Did you want it?”
That seems to give Connor pause for thought.
Risa knows he didn’t want it, but he had been willing to take it when the alternative was a miserable life with a miserable family. Just as Hannah is willing to save it from an uncertain future right now.

This brings us to a common problem I have in crappy dystopias.

Did any of you watch Dark Angel? I remember one story involved some poor little orphan girl and the resolution was that hacker guy found a nice family who had a farm and ponies who wanted a daughter so they adopted her. Except in a world where there are dozens and dozens of poor little orphans starving in the streets, why would anyone who wanted a kid not already have five?

And in a world where kids are getting put on your doorstep all the time, isn’t it a big coincidence that this hasn’t already happened to Hannah? Or happened to someone else in her family, or her husband’s family, or a friend, someone who couldn’t take care of it? I mean, honestly, unless they’ve betrayed Risa and are marching her off the to death harvest camp, Risa’s actually best suited for a kid, since she has nothing better to do with her time. In fact, they could take care of more kids than they currently are! Giving each kid a kid would probably be too much, but the five of them could probably handle like, three kids maybe? And I bet Roland would be great with one. He’d be following everyone else around bitching about how you have to cut up grapes or the kid can choke and OMG NO YOU CAN’T GIVE BABBY HONEY.

Plus, Roland’s dickery really seems to be of the stir-crazy kind combined with wanting to be necessary, so handing him something that actually needs him to make decisions and control its behavior would probably help a lot.

Back to what’s actually in this terrible book.

Risa is all relieved but sad about the baby, and has this “phantom sort of aching” and christ book how much more can you fuck up the whole women and babies thing? Well, I’m sure I’ll find out soon.

Women get super attached to babies because HORMONES FROM CHILDBIRTH, which incidentally is part of why abortions are better than having it and giving it up for adoption. People in general get attached to babies because babies kind of do that to you because biology rewards those who care for their young rather than strangle them. It’s not actually a gendered thing.

Inside, they discover the ice cream truck is empty of ice cream, and also empty of the refrigeration, but still somehow cold because fucking stupid.

If anything, I’d assume that in the absence of something keeping the truck cold, its temperature would equalize but it’d heat up fast, because you’d expect it to be insulated and the kids themselves are generating heat. And there are already kids in there.

It makes her furious that she actually misses the baby. It was thrust upon her at the worst possible moment in her life—why should she have any regret about being rid of it?

Because only irresponsible slutwhores give up babies.

She thinks about the days before the Heartland War, when unwanted babies could just be unwanted pregnancies, quickly made to go away. Did the women who made that other choice feel the way she felt now? Relieved and freed from an unwelcome and often unfair responsibility . . . yet vaguely regretful?

Sure, if you add that statistically most of them quickly got over their vaguely regretful feelings and you factor in that “vaguely regretful” is how people will feel about basically anything that doesn’t happen short of getting shot in the face.

This is some fair and balancing it up. It looks surprisingly evenhanded, but this is actually nothing new from the prolife side. They don’t find it hard to believe abortion may look like a good idea from the women’s point of view, that’s why they don’t want women making decisions.

But hey, at least someone’s remembered abortion existed once. That’s actually a step up.

Risa then explains that at the state home, they have a ton of infants. Sometimes she was assigned to help out.

The infant wing had been massive and overflowing with identical cribs, each containing a baby that nobody had wanted, wards of a state that could barely feed them, much less nurture them.

Okay, I know research fail has been way worse here, but this is getting back to this being horrible propaganda. Namely:

Kids do not come out okay without nurture. This has happened. It was very very bad.

This is where the earlier laws/human nature comes from. One of the nurses would say the bit about changing human nature, someone else would response with the opposite.

Which was worse, Risa often wondered—to have tens of thousands of babies that no one wanted, or to silently make them go away before they were even born? On different days Risa had different answers.

That’s because you’re a fucking idiot, Risa. Especially as we’re about to see just how horrible being not wanted is:

there was only one nurse for every fifty babies.

You couldn’t even feed them fast enough.

“In a place like this you have to practice triage,” she told Risa, referring to how, in an emergency, a nurse had to choose which patients would get medical attention. “Love the ones you can,” Nurse Greta told her. “Pray for the rest.”

No, in a place like this you smother them.

This, I think, is the ultimate condemnation of this book. It doesn’t care about the women at all – they’re not even a factor in the question of unwanted pregnancies – but at least it doesn’t pretend to.

It pretends to care about children, but it knows nothing about them. The author is trying to paint a picture of neglect when he has no idea what care they actually need. And he doesn’t bother finding out, because it doesn’t matter what care they need, because they don’t matter, not really. Whether or not raising them is easy or even possible doesn’t matter to the fact abortion is wrong. He has outlined a world in which most babies starve to death in their cribs and he doesn’t care. Facts aren’t important, because all that matters is that women can’t be allowed to get away with having sex.

Risa took the advice to heart, and selected a handful of favorites to give extra attention

That’s not actually what happens. What happens is, faced with children dying, the caregivers learn to only favor the children who look healthiest and won’t die while ignoring the rest. This only serves to increase the death rate, but the caretakers are usually oblivious, having rationalized that the weaker ones would have died anyway. And it is sound biological strategy, because merely surviving isn’t actually a good benchmark. The lucky few picked for actual care may get enough of it to actually develop somewhat normally, while caring for all of them equally would produce more survivors but all of them would be in worse condition. Although we like to pretend we’re rational, we behave no different from the rest of the animal kingdom: in times of plenty, we favor the weaker offspring who’ll need extra resources to develop. In times of stress, we leave them to die and pool what we have into the one that has the best chance.

It’s unlikely Risa’s “handful of favorites” are getting any of that, simply because a handful of babies is already pushing the maximum number of children a single person can care for. One adult to ten older kids at an orphanage is a terrible ratio, and the younger they are the more care they need. She’s also apparently not picking the same ones as the other caretakers, which is necessary for the children to get consistent care – slightly more attention for a couple hours is not going to do anything.

Supposedly, Risa herself was an abandoned infant just like them, but this is obviously false by the fact Risa is not only alive but capable of speech, normal human interaction, and fine motor control.

But then, supposedly Risa went on to learn piano and then get picked for unwinding because it wasn’t useful, which is just as impossible. The state homes should have been using the kids to care for the younger ones all the time, not just as an occasional quick job, and officially marking it down as training them to be nurses. They shouldn’t have any resources left over to train kids in stupid shit like piano, plus they’re all neglected and brain damaged, so it’d have been a complete waste of time to try.

In somewhat less terrible news, Risa explains her assigned name is Hispanic and wonders if she shares any of that actual heritage, reminding us that not only is everyone white but they’re so white that Hispanic is a separate race. Notably absent is Risa adding that her skin color in any way supports this theory, because Connor’s girlfriend must be of the master race.

“Hannah will give her a good home,” Connor says. “Better than us, that’s for sure, and better than that beady-eyed cow who got storked.”

Because someone unhappy to be handed a terrible burden is automatically a terrible person. It’s sort of like how the fact every pet I have is something we had to take because someone else couldn’t is why I regularly abuse and/or kill them.

One of the kids already there explains that they’re going to another safe house. The kids get funneled from one safe house to another for a while until they reach the final place called the graveyard, which sounds sinister until you remember that the whole issue here is people’s insistence that unwinding isn’t death, so graveyard sounds like it could be a play on this, because they’re not “living on in a divided state”.

The graveyard. The thought of it makes Risa even colder.

Only because you’re stupid. It’d have been insanely easy to kill all of you earlier if that were the idea. In fact, you just went through something where each kid left one by one, so there isn’t even the problem of springing the murdering on you.

But anyway it’s cold in the unrefrigerated truck because author fiat therefore:
Connor must hear the chattering of her teeth, because he puts his arm around her.
“I’m cold too,” he says. “Body heat, right?”
And although she has an urge to push him away, she finds herself leaning into him until she can feel his heartbeat in her ears.

Because she has a vagina and he’s the main character, therefore girlfriend.

19 Comments

  1. piehole says:

    Tens of thousands of unwanted babies…. I still find it difficult to believe that illegal abortions simply don’t exist. Women have always been willing to take the risk; why not now?

    Also

    …she finds herself leaning into him until she can feel his heartbeat in her ears.

    Isn’t the sense usually associated with ears hearing? Especially the inside parts of ears. Though maybe Risa is sensitive enough to feel the little bones banging together.

    1. actonthat says:

      I still can’t get past the “no birth control” issue. I mean, not even people on hormones for unrelated reasons that act as birth control, no unofficial herbal supplements, nothing.

      Not that I’m surprised the worldbuilding in this ham-fisted allegory is that thin, but… still.

      1. Farla says:

        Think of teh babbies! All stuff that could accidentally abort a baby is presumably banned on principle. Life begins at conception and a lot of women’s birth control will also stop implantation of a fertilized egg.

        There have already been doctors that would deny women treatment because it might kill their fetus, so it wouldn’t be that big of a step.

        1. actonthat says:

          See, that’s one of the things I don’t get– if life starts at conception, then if there’s no conception, who cares? I’m pretty sure the Catholic Church of okay with Plan B for this reason, actually. And by that logic, every menstrual cycle is a homocide because an egg had the potential for fertilization.

          I can understand people feeling that first-trimester abortion is murder even at those early stages if you think life begins at conception. I CAN’T get the idea that preventing conception is also evil.

          1. Farla says:

            But the Baptist wing isn’t okay with Plan B for exactly that reason – it prevents implantation, meaning if there is a fertilized egg, it’s MURDERED. Since the Catholic focus is more on nonreproductive sex is bad, they’re less hung up on policing rape victims.

            And by that logic, every menstrual cycle is a homocide because an egg had the potential for fertilization.

            I think the only reason this isn’t seriously pursued is because there are too many eggs for a women to give birth to them, and also they require everyone to be married first while still fetishizing virginity, so women are going to have a bunch of periods before they have kids. But the quiverful movement is definitely approaching the idea that once married, not having every baby you can until it kills you is evil.

      2. Ten to one the author has no idea that the same substances that are used in birth control are also used for other health conditions (for example, to control menstruation so women like me with fibroids don’t die of acute anemia, etc.)

        1. Farla says:

          Going by the fact they’re okay denying women abortions even in the event of an already dead baby that’ll kill the women if it’s not removed, I think they’re fine killing a few extra women. What’s important is you didn’t accidentally abort any babies.

          1. Oh I agree, but this guy sounds like he really doesn’t even know. Like that weirdo who thinks women on the pill have thousands of dead babies inside of them.

    2. Farla says:

      I suspect that the way it actually works out is that adult women get abortions but teens and some twenty-somethings don’t have access to a sympathetic family doctor or other connections, and have been thoroughly abstinence-only-educationed into not knowing options exist.

  2. MGP says:

    So… her name meaning “laughter” was intentional. I’m unsure how to respond – amusement, sadness, and snarky “you can’t have slaughter without laughter” comments are warring in my brain.

    1. piehole says:

      “You can’t have slaughter without laughter” should be the title of a much better dystopian novel than this one.

      1. piehole says:

        Subtitle, I mean. Sheesh.

    2. Farla says:

      “It’s short for sonrisa,” a Hispanic kid once told her. “That’s Spanish for ‘smile.'”

      Not exactly intentional.

    3. actonthat says:

      Really, with a book this hacky, that a name like “Risa” was supposed to be ~*special*~ is kind of a forgone conclusion.

  3. piehole says:

    Does Risa mention her skin color at all? I assume you’d have mentioned if she’d called herself lily-sienna or whateverthefuck term Brer Dumbass used.

    1. Farla says:

      I assume if she was anything short of true fishbelly white she’d have mentioned it when saying she could have Hispanic blood, so she must be the lilliest of the siennas.

  4. Anon says:

    I honestly thought Risa was a Japanese name and pictured her as Asian. Well until Mai was introduced and when the author felt the need to emphasize she was Asian there was no way Risa would be without some big deal about it.

  5. Molly says:

    I’m honestly offended that the author thinks Risa is a decent example of a person from that sort of orphanage. My cousin Alia was from a horrible orphanage where she was never given proper attention, taught how to speak, or walk or anything. It was located in one of the poorer areas of either Ukraine or Moldova (My uncle had been working in both areas at the time, switching between the two so I’m not quite sure which one he was in when he and his wife adopted her) and to this day she and her family still struggle with the effects of less than three years of being in that situation.

    When my uncle and his wife first adopted Alia, they thought she might have brain damage or be mentally handicapped because she didn’t speak at all and she couldn’t really walk. She made moaning noises when she was happy and she could scream and cry when she was upset, but not much else. She knew absolutely no words in either language, even basic ones. Her limbs were weak because she spent most of her life in a crib, so at the age of two she could crawl and sort of stand, but walking was almost impossible for her. She had trouble eating a lot of solid foods. Also, after being outside once or twice she became obsessed with it, always looking outside of windows, and freaking out when it rained (we don’t think she had ever been outside or experienced rain before that because the orphanage had very few windows and none in the rooms where she was kept).

    After a year or so of numerous tests, examinations and doctor visits all show she’s not brain damaged utterly crippled by her time in the orphanage. They say her biggest problem is that she missed out on very important development stages both mentally and physically. So they help develop a physical therapy plan for her so she can learn to walk and eat normal solid food, as well as teaching her language.

    When I saw her at the age of five, she still hadn’t grasped language well. Full sentences were difficult for her. For example, she wanted me to push her on the swing, so she would tug on my shirt and say “Alia Molly blue swing” while pointing outside. She understood that she was Alia and she wanted me (Molly) to help her use the blue swing. Her parents were so proud of her for being able to do that because that meant she was grasping the symbolism of words, something she had had trouble doing before.

    She was also still in diapers by that point because she had never been toilet trained. She’s out them now, but it took them until she was around six years old to get her out of pull ups and just recently she was finally getting a handle on bed wetting.

    Now she’s eight years old and she’s only been going to an “official” school for a year (it’s for learning disabled and mentally challenged children) she probably wont go to a normal school for a long time because she’s just so far behind. She’s learning to read right now and she loooooves the book the Chika Chika Boom Boom (an alphabet book) and her brother’s Big Bug Book (a pop up book). The last time I saw her she made me listen to her read them a dozen times, then made me get out my old children’s books and help her read them. She still has trouble writing and gripping pencils and things like that, though she loves coloring so she’s getting a lot of practice.

    So yeah, you’re right, if Risa was ever in one of those homes she would NOT be playing the piano or acting this well developed mentally and socially. The fact that the author seems to think she would be is offensive to me because it ignores how horrible this kind of set up is for everyone involved in favor of pretending that this kind of thing is preferable to abortions or birth control.

    1. Farla says:

      That’s horrifying, and I’m glad she’s improving and has people who know how to help.

      To my understanding, even the good orphanages lead to developmental problems, and it gets worse so fast from there.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *