Wither, Ch20

Last time on end already, Cecily gave birth.


Evil mad scientist evilly grabs her baby and resuscitates it (evilly) while everyone else stands around gaping like idiots.

“Congratulations,” Vaughn says, holding the writhing child up in his gloved hands. “You have a son.”

Then why was Rhine going on and on about how he’d murder it if it was a granddaughter? I assumed that was because they knew the gender from all the ultrasounds.

“Where’s my baby?” Cecily whispers. Her eyes are glassy and distant. Tears and sweat roll down her face. Her breaths rattle in her chest.
“We’ll see him soon, love,” Linden says, and kisses her.
For the moment she looks nothing like a child. If I didn’t know either of them, I would almost believe that they were a normal mother and father in a normal hospital under normal circumstances.

No you wouldn’t, because she’s a thirteen year old girl. She never “looks nothing like a child”. A twenty year old and thirteen year old never look like a normal relationship. STOP IT.

Then Rhine switches over to worrying about Cecily. This might seem out of character, but it’s because in this case, worrying about Cecily is an excuse to bitch about evil mad scientist not taking her to a real hospital, not to in any way imply that maybe the rapist shouldn’t have fucked a thirteen year old or anything.

Also, it’s obvious that evil mad scientist would have all necessary medical equipment here, given how much he likes having the place be self-contained. And the chance of infection is much lower than at a hospital, which are extremely well bleached cesspits of unkillable bacteria.

What if giving birth was too traumatic for her small frame and there are complications?

Rhine, she was gushing blood. I know you’re lazy and suck at basic problem solving, but that’s a complication. There is no “what if” here. It was and there were.

She then goes on for a while about how she doesn’t have any chance to go see Gabriel now, and in passing mentions that by the way, evil mad scientist walked off with the kid and is keeping it in the basement and might murder it any second. Also, she can’t see Gabriel.

Because she’s a terrible protagonist, it doesn’t occur to her to say to evil mad scientist that she’d like to sit with the baby, giving her an excuse to go down there.

(From the sounds of it, it’s likely evil mad scientist is concerned the kid may have inhaled amniotic fluid, since he seemed to need to clear the kid’s throat to get it to breathe. That’s why doctors wouldn’t give me back to my mother, and I’m pretty sure it wasn’t because they were evilly planning evil but because inhaling gunk into your lungs is bad.)

Hours later the rapist goes down to see his kid and is all happy. So naturally he wants to fuck her.

The characterization here is surprisingly consistent. When a lot of men talk about viewing labor, they often see is as traumatic and painful. Their basic empathy kicks in and they imagine having to pass a huge lump through their genitals as they stretch and tear. They’re really happy about the miracle of life and all that came out, but their thoughts are not, at this instant, “Awesome! Let me fuck you so you can do that again!”

The rapist, on the other hand, is so turned on by this. That’s what women are for, to do things for him.

Then he gets on the ledge beside me, and I curl my knees to my chest to make room for him. He smiles at me, and I sense him advancing.
Gently he moves my legs from between us, and my feet land on the ground, and he tilts my chin and kisses me.
I allow it, because I’m first wife—the key card makes it as official as it could get—and because I promised him I’d be a better wife, and it would make him suspicious if I pushed him away. And because, truthfully, it isn’t the worst thing in the world to kiss Linden Ashby.

TVtropes claims in Marital Rape License that:

There are two basic ways in which this can come into play as a trope:
Type A is when a character or group of characters clearly are guided by this kind of morality, but this is not portrayed in a positive light. On the contrary, it is used to define them as villainous or at least severely flawed. In contemporary works, all examples of this trope can be safely assumed to be Type A unless otherwise noted.
Type B is when the narrative itself buys into the morality: It is portrayed as if the woman had it coming for denying her husband his marital rights. However, she still doesn’t enjoy it: If the wife seems to be happy with the forceful sex, then it’s an entirely different trope, and yet another trope if they had agreed on it rather than her being okay with it retroactively. This Type B of the trope typically only comes up in older works. 

Unfortunately, and perhaps an expected oversight for the site, this is referring to violent rape and/or unusual types of sex, which is what the majority of examples listed involve. So while believing it’s okay to beat your wife first may be confined to older works, the perception that wives owe sex is not.
Because she doesn’t immediately shove him off, he starts trying to take her nightgown off. Rhine decides she’s not ready to go that far.

“Is it because the door is open?” he asks. “I’ll close it.”

I have a sinking feeling this is supposed to be a sign of how considerate he is.

Then he starts saying he loves her and wants to have a baby. Rhine attempts to switch things to the subject of all the other stuff she wants to do with him, like seeing houses built and going to parties.

The romance is draining from his face, replaced by confusion or disappointment—I can’t tell which.

Spending time together and sharing interests is unromantic, unlike fucking someone because you just want to collect babies.

He looks heartbroken, though, so I give in and sit close to him and let him put his arm around me. He loves me, he says, but how can he when we know so little about each other?

No, book. It’s not that he doesn’t know her. It’s that he doesn’t love her. His other wife just had a kid and instead of spending his time with it he’s trying to fuck another one into being.

Rhine says that she doesn’t have long before he’ll get suspicious she’s refusing to have sex, so she guesses she should try to escape soon. It’s only taken almost year for her to figure that out.

The next day she notices the servants are being unusually fawning, and Jenna explains it’s because she’s first wife now. This doesn’t actually make sense but I’m sure the author will forget about it soon anyway.

Cecily’s still messed up from the birth.

She’s lost too much blood. That’s Vaughn’s diagnosis, and I agree, but I’m still uneasy when she’s given the transfusion. I lay beside her as she recovers, as the color slowly returns to her cheeks, and I wonder whose blood is coursing through her. Maybe Rose’s. Or some unwilling attendant’s. I wonder if Vaughn, who I believe is capable of such darkness and destruction, ever truly uses his abilities to heal.

So he says the problem is X, and she agrees it’s X. He does the correct procedure to deal with X, and she bitches about it. She watches the procedure fix X. Then she says that he’s evil and doesn’t really heal people.

Does the author think this is sympathetic or reasonable? What the hell is she trying to get across here?

Rhine then says that Cecily’s fine and happy and she’s sure they’ll have a wonderful life together and that’s why it’s important only she escape.

Later, Cecily takes the baby out when she decides to play on the piano.

Her son makes uncertain faces and wriggles in place, unsure what to do with all this splendor.

Actually at this stage in his life, he’s incapable of any voluntary motion. I think it’s only by five months they gain such advanced abilities as control of where they’re looking.

Babies are weird.

As he grows, he will see many illusions. He will watch paintings come to life as music plays for him, and he’ll see his father’s houses spin, and he’ll dive into schools of guppies and great whites in the swimming pool. But I don’t suppose he will ever know the ocean lapping up around his ankles, or will ever cast a fishing line, or have a house of his own.

There’s really no reason why he couldn’t. The rapist is allowed out all he wants. Even if we assume that Cecily won’t be because everyone is a controlling asshole who hates women, the kid can still go to the beach since it’s a boy.

Cecily then complains she wants a real piano, not the fake kind that makes holograms. Jenna says real things aren’t allowed here. No one considers that they could just ask someone for a real piano, just like it’s been almost a year and Rhine still can’t figure out she could just ask for the damn candy if she wants it so much.

10 Comments

  1. C.C. says:

    I was out shopping today and came across the sequel in the bestsellers section. I read the synopsis and proceeded to LOL. I won’t repeat it here for fear of spoiling this masterpiece for you, but the sequel looks like it carries the heartwarming themes found throughout this book. I might pick it up and tell you about it for the hell of it, like I did with Gemma Doyle and The Summoning.

    1. Farla says:

       I was originally planning to do Fever as well (not necessarily right after this, but in a few months) but now I’m not sure.

  2. You know, if I was an editor and this manuscript had come across my desk, I wouldn’t have published it — I would have instead wanted to talk to the author about her many, many psychological issues. This is why I would have made a lousy editor. One of the reasons.

    Anyway, it horrifies me that they are selling this sort of corrupt trash to young people. And I can see why — it has everything the publishing world thinks the YA audience, female division, like: sex, babies, cute upper-class bad boy in love with heroine, cute lower-class good boy in love with heroine, vague dangers that either never come to pass or happen off-stage, “bird in a golden cage” luxury porn, and a heroine who doesn’t do anything herself except for that one time she fucked up because females = incompetent idiots who need to be rescued. I’ll bet the “great escape” finally happens due to Gabriel finally helping her or else some sort of deus ex machina because lord knows Rhine doesn’t have it in her to do it on her own.

    1
    1. Farla says:

       I suppose the question becomes, how much is this being written/published because it’s what they think girls should want, and how much is because they think it reflects what they do want?

      1. waretaringo says:

        If you’re looking for ethically inspired conduct I’m pretty sure publishing isn’t the place to find it. Sure shot this was a profit-driven printing.

        1. Farla says:

          I’m sure they wouldn’t buy it if they didn’t think it’d sell, but authors usually aren’t in it just for the money (because there is basically none) and even the individuals that make up a publisher generally like books and want to be producing good stuff.

  3. actonthat says:

    [
    No you wouldn’t, because she’s a thirteen year old girl. She never “looks nothing like a child”. A twenty year old and thirteen year old never look like a normal relationship. STOP IT.]

    There’s an even more horrific layer to this. What the author is saying here is that if the little girl LOOKS old enough, it’s not rape or pedophilia. It’s an iteration of the “her skirt is too short” horror: a young girl who DARES to mature early is clearly asking for it just by having boobs. It’s okay to ogle a fifth-grader who wears eyeliner and developed kind of early, because she deserves it for looking like a woman. She’s basically asking for it.

    [Rhine says that she doesn’t have long before he’ll get suspicious she’s refusing to have sex, so she guesses she should try to escape soon.]

    I have to wonder what exactly the author DOES consider rape. He’s trying to touch her and her internal monologue is screaming NO. How is this not rape? How extreme does it have to get? Does she have to be screaming out loud? Does he have to be restraining her? Does she have to be in a dark alley? Or is the author really so fucked up that she thinks there’s always a reason why the guy forced himself on a woman? After all, Linden just wants sex from his kidnapped wife. He derves it!

    I honestly wouldn’t put it past this woman at this point if she really flat-out didn’t believe there was really such thing as rape. She’s a complete monster.

    1
    1. Farla says:

      It probably comes down to reproductive/nonreproductive sex. If you just say nonreproductive sex is immoral, then pedophila is wrong because little girls usually can’t get pregnant, but she’s fair game as soon as you know the ovaries start working. But the book is very moral and indicates that mere fertility isn’t enough, you should also give minor consideration to if the kid can carry a kid to term because otherwise it’s edging toward nonreproductive sex again and that’s wrong.

      And see, it’s not rape with Rhine because she only doesn’t want sex because she’s a soulless bitch planning to crush Linden-chan’s heart by running away. Women never just don’t want to have sex. They might not want to have sex because they’re preserving their most precious treasure for their true owner, or because they don’t want to have a baby with someone they don’t love, or because, like Jenna, they just won’t let go of minor slights like their family being murdered so they want to punish their owner. But otherwise, not wanting to have sex is like not wanting to move over so you’re not hogging the whole couch.

      The only time a woman can be raped is if there’s sex that’s against the wishes of her owner. That’s why they have to marry the girls before they can have sex with them.

    2. Elisabeth says:

      Fuck yes. I had the misfortune of being a sexual late bloomer who went through the physical development early. Perverts thought it was okay to catcall me and treat me like a piece of meat since I looked old enough, never mind that I hated having to wear a bra at age 10. Puberty is tough enough without having adults who think you’re slutty and sexually precocious because your breasts developed early.

      I wondered if the author belongs to some culty religious group, like the Quiverfull movement, where women are only good for making babies and where there’s no such thing as abusive marriages, there’s only wives who get what’s coming to them because they didn’t obey their husbands.

      1
      1. Farla says:

        After reading all the books and bits of other stuff, I still have no idea what the author thinks beyond that she seems to have some idea this stuff is miserable for the women involved and apparently identifies as a feminist.

        Also, god, sorry you had to go through that.

        1

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *