“Hey, heard you’re a Poké bully to others. Not nice,you might not care but stop and grow up. Mind you’re own business and support not shame. Byyyeeeee. P. not stop until you stop”
For bonus points, this was an anonymous reviewer.
TrashYattA response to your review at https://www.fanfiction.net/r/13134420/
Hi, and thanks for your input. I’m indeed not an English speaker (nor writer for that matter, but i try.)
I just use these [«»] since i feel it’s…cleaner, i guess.
But thanks for the criticism. I know i need it. :)
A response to your review at https://www.fanfiction.net/r/13132444/
First of all, thanks for the reviews! I too believe constructive criticism is the way to go, and I appreciate people who give it out.
As for the review itself:
Prologue:
– I would capitalize race or species name in most settings. It grants relevancy to the name and the individual(s) associanted with it. In this story, a Pokémon’s species serves as its identity, much more so than, for example, human beings (you’ll see how and why in future chapters).
– Even though it may be correct, writing dialogue like you said breaks its flow. I will stand by my convention.
– The prologue and the first chapter portray different characters, are completely disconnected spatially and only vaguely connected temporally. It wouldn’t make sense to merge them.
Chapter 1:
– You’re right. Fixing that one.
– Kalian isn’t the only instructor. I don’t mention that in the story but I thought it was obvious due to the ‘clues’ I left throughout the chapter. E.g.: Brent mentioning ‘our group’ and ‘From the thousands of people that applied’
– Kanto law is quite different from our law. Pokémon research is generally held in high regard.
– Again, different laws. In addition, he had already been paid 10000 pokédollars, not to mention Silph is a worldwide famous company. I don’t mention that in the story because it’s kind of implied in the games. If you still see something wrong with this, then you’re on the right track ;)
– Thoughts are italicized for a clear distinction from other forms of ‘speech’.
– This is Brent’s point of view. Pokémon battles are nothing special to us, but he really admires them. I want to put emphasis on that because it will be relevant in the future. Stick around to find out why.
– I did. ‘Confident in my choice, I signed the contract’ This is after Brent’s dream, 4 paragraphs before the one you mentioned.
– Bear in mind that he’s legally bound. He doesn’t want to mess with a world-famous company.
– I feel like you skipped a lot while reading. I understand my story may not be very good, but please do read everything before posting a review. Regardless, 4900 words should never be enough to cover the entire summary and completely flesh out a character in his emotional and physical aspects, along with his life experiences.
I really, really have to insist on this. Two punctuation marks in a row breaks flow and looks really bizarre. The entire point of the standardized form is that it does maintain flow; as I said, it works as if the quote marks aren’t there.
[Kalian isn’t the only instructor.]
I’d still say it’s obvious their instructor is the one they’re reporting to. Generally, the phrasing sounds really odd, like the speaker is tripping over his words — the first sentence sounds like something you’d say to someone already familiar with the person you’re talking about, but the second is something you’d only say if the person has no idea what’s going on. Did Kalian not introduce himself? It just all seems very strange to me.
[Kanto law is quite different from our law. Pokémon research is generally held in high regard.]
Scientific research is also held in high regard in our world, and it’s still beholden to very stringent consent laws. You can totally say this is totally different from our world and gross oversight is allowed, but without declaring that explicitly it’s still going to throw people. It’d be hard to work into narration, but… maybe just have him think about it more in his reaction, to give us a better sense of what the general idea of risk would be in this situation? Right now he just comes up with “I have no idea, but I’m going to charge into the unknown anyway!” which just makes him look extremely foolhardy.
[Thoughts are italicized for a clear distinction from other forms of ‘speech’.]
What is this referring to?
[I did. ‘Confident in my choice, I signed the contract’ This is after Brent’s dream, 4 paragraphs before the one you mentioned.]
Whoops, I missed that. That’s fine, then.
[Bear in mind that he’s legally bound. He doesn’t want to mess with a world-famous company.]
But that’s more reason to freak out, not less. Possibly you are meaning to portray Brent as the chillest dude ever, but his behavior isn’t portrayed as unusual. I really don’t think the average person would just take this all in stride.
[Regardless, 4900 words should never be enough to cover the entire summary and completely flesh out a character in his emotional and physical aspects, along with his life experiences.]
Yes, but you still have to hint that those things exist. Just from the information I have now, Brent seems like a very bland character, to be frank. His narration is very unembellished and matter-of-fact, even when he is in stressful situations; he doesn’t seem to have meaningful emotional reactions to anything. If you do mean for us to pick up on something odd about him, the first chapter is the place to do that by demonstrating any unique or unusual quirks he has. We don’t need to know the deep dark reason behind those quirks right away, but they should manifest in visible ways that give us clues to the puzzle.
– Kalian didn’t introduce himself ‘properly’. He was their drill sergeant up until the point where he ‘changed his demeanor’ and as such I saw no need for them to know his name. On the other hand, Julius was told about Brent and his group’s identities.
– Well, if I try to explain that I will give away some plot details. However, you’re right about his reaction. I will add in a few hints as to what’s really going on.
– ‘What the hell was that?!’ is italicized in the story. Thoughts begin with a ‘, while speech begins with a “, in addition to not being italicized.
– See answer #3.
– Bis.
Yes, I wasn’t saying otherwise. I was commenting on the use of single quotes in addition to the italics.
If it’s not italicized it implies sound eg. speech
It makes everything more clear and unambiguous.
Debated pushing further, but decided I wasn’t going to get anywhere. It is very bothersome when people freeze up like this, but I’ll have to hope I’ve given them something to think about.
St Elmo’s Fire,
A new guest review has been posted to your story. Please login to moderate this review.
Story: The Boulevard of Broken Hearts
Chapter: 3. Chapter 3
From: Guest
——————-
:Hey, heard you’re a Poké bully to others. Not nice,you might not care but stop and grow up. Mind you’re own business and support not shame. Byyyeeeee. P. not stop until you stop
——————-
Two responses… Only two responses. Lol, this has to be the best week ever!
Not for you though.
I’m sorry, Hybrid. Are you still playing that little game where you pretend to be a critic and give false advice?
Yes, it is. This is two positive responses and zero negative ones (not counting the anon review, who could well be an earlier respondent and thus cannot be fairly counted). That makes me look very good.
For real, Sevenways, last thing before we ban you: telling people not to air their grievances with me was the stupidest thing you could have done. Because people who respond to me are the only ones who are visible, to all the world it looks like everyone loves me now. If you want to destroy me, you need to let people tell me they hate me.