People continue to be very, very chill. Pyle is back, which might be filtering out the more volatile elements.
re: Your review to Competitive Repercussion
Thank for the review! I will say that someone was going to help me edit it but i had already posted it. I agree with what you said about using said, me mostly being taught about said sometimes clashes with how my school self was taught what said should used for. I thank you for the kind words and I will try and change up a few things to make it more interesting.
re: Your review to Dappled Grove
missuskWoah, fast review, thanks for such a detailed response!! good catch on the typos & trigger warning!
re: Your review to Something New

Alright, thank you kindly. Heard a lot of bad crap about you but seems like you’re just trying to help. I will work on my sentence structure, and try to find a beta reader. If you have any other ways I can improve my writing please do tell.


[I was also able to show the Wayfinder Corporation was responsible for zoroark attack and that they are testing something while capturing other trainer’s pokemon that seem to be strong.]
I’d say my problem with this is that we currently lack the context for why these people and their experiment are important, or even who they are. A spooky evil corporation doing spooky evil corporation things could be the opening to a lot of different stories.
This might work out once you start posting more and the reader has more to read immediately, of course. But as a standalone it’s a bit confusing at the moment.
Broken how? They’re displaying fine for me.